It encouraged other revolts also. Aurangzeb issued very strict instructions to the officers regarding the collection of Jaziya: Thus, the Deccan policy of Aurangzeb ultimately failed. No wonder, Aurangzeb proceeded in person to put an end of these states. Thus the bulk of the population of the two dissolved states went to swell the power of Sambhaji and his highlanders, and the disastrous results of this revolution in Deccan politics were felt for more than a century.
But it was a temporary success. In the twelfth year of his rule, he ordered the demolition of all important and famous temples within his empire. The Mughals again attacked it in A.
Aurangzeb failed to consolidate his success. Thus, Babur and Humayun had no planned policy towards the Deccan.
Shah Jahan also attempted either to annex the kingdoms of the Deccan or force them to accept the suzerainty of the emperor. Aurangzeb's policy towards the Deccan had political as well as religious purpose. The Marathas too could be left in peace provided they restricted themselves to the south and did not raid Mughals territory.
Shivaji had carved out an independent Maratha state in the territories north and south of Konkan. The conquests of Bijapur and Golconda did not complete the conquest of the Deccan by Aurangzeb.
The Maratha foamed back for the independence of Maharashtra and finally succeeded. The Deccan policy of the Mughals reached the perfection of its success during the rule of Aurangzeb.
God has been in my heart yet my darkened eyes have not recognized his light. Muhammad Shah begged pardon which was granted by Humayun. Jahangir deputed his most capable officers in the campaigns of the Deccan but no success was gained because of the mutual differences among the Mughul officers and the success of Malik Ambar in opposing them.
The failure of the Deccan policy of Aurangzeb participated in the disintegration of the Mughal Empire.
Securing Bijapur's support to help defeat Shivaji, was the third alternative left to the Mughals. The Hindu prisoners were freed on their conversion to Islam.
Akbar failed to take any action against Bijapur and Golconda during his life-time. September 9, By Bharat Mehta Akbar was the first among the Mughal emperors to have affected conquests beyond the Vindhyas.
Sikandar Adil Shah was captured and made a prisoner. Besides, Akbar was not happy with the Portuguese who were becoming powerful on the sea-coast of India. Hussain Shah was imprisoned in the fort of Gwalior and Ahmadnagar was annexed to the Mughul empire.
It led to several conflicts and wars in different parts of the country. He opened negotiations with the Mughuls and at the same time tried to befriend Bijapur. Khafi Khan has given the following account of this brave man; "Abdur Razzak Lari heard this and, springing on horse without any saddle, with a sword in one hand and a shield in the other, and accompanied by 10 or 12 followers, he rushed to the open gate through which the Imperial Forces were pouring in.
Jai Singh advocated the conquest of Bijapur with Shivaji's help, rather than attacking the Deccan states and the Marathas simultaneously. Besides this political motive, he desired to annex these states because their rulers were Shias.
On the morning of the second day, a party of men belonging to Husaini Beg passed and recongnising him by his horse and other signs, they took compassion upon him and carried him upon a bedstead to a house. Removal of the Hindus from Government jobs: Shivaji had established an independent kingdom in Maharashtra.Aurangzeb employed the scorched earth policy, sending soldiers who massacred, looted and burnt many villages.
Aurangzeb also proceeded to use bribery to turn the Pashtun tribes against each other, with the aim that they would distract a unified Pashtun challenge to Mughal authority, and the impact of this was to leave a lasting legacy of.
Aurangzeb’s Deccan policy was a miserable failure. His wars against Bijapur and Golkunda did not ease the task of the Marathas, as some writers suggest, but these alienated the Shia Muslim sentiment.
Aurangzeb’s Deccan Policy Aurangzeb’s Deccan policy was influenced partly by imperial interests and partly by the religious considerations. In Deccan Aurangzeb failed to assess the situation realistically hence unable to take agronumericus.comi had carved out an independent Maratha state in the territories north and south of Konkan.
Aurangzeb spent the last 25 years of his life () in the Deccan. According to J. N. Sarkar, 'Looking collectively at the Mughal gains in the Deccan during the first twenty years of Get Complete Information on Deccan Policy of Aurangzeb.
The Deccan Policy of Aurangzeb was very aggresive. Aurangzeb’s accession in gave him an opportunity to fulfill his aggressive designs with regard to Deccan. The three powers in the Deccan with which he had to deal were the Marathas and the two Shiah states of Bijapur and Golkunda.
Aurangzeb, of course destroyed the Maratha kingdom but his success was short-lived. The Maratha foamed back for the independence of Maharashtra and finally succeeded.
Thus, the Deccan policy of the great Mughals initially succeeded but ultimately failed.
Babur could pay no attention towards the south.Download